Mga Sanggunian sa Talmud para sa Mga Kawikaan 12:21: Jerusalem Talmud Berakhot & Berakhot

It was stated²⁶¹This baraita is also quoted in Babli Ketubot 5b, where it is determined that “others” means R. Simeon who states that an action not expressly intended is not forbidden on the Sabbath. It is explained there, that even though R. Simeon forbids actions which automatically imply some other action that desecrates the Sabbath, here he allows a first sex act on Sabbath since splitting the hymen is not a necessary consequence if the male partner is considerate (and, consequently, an intact hymen is no guarantee of virginity.) Since we decide on the Sabbath according to the opinion of Rebbi Simeon and since the medical statement is by Samuel, the greatest medical authority in the Babli, it is clear that the Babli decides that first sex relations on Friday night are permitted. (In the Middle Ages, poor people married on Friday afternoon in order to save expenses for a separate wedding meal.) It is seen here that the Yerushalmi is strictly of the opposite opinion; hence, the identity of “others” is not determined here.: “A man should not have first sexual relations on the Sabbath because he makes a wound; but others allow it.” Rebbi Yose bar Abun said: The reason of the others is that he is intent on his job; the wound results automatically²⁶²Hence, the act is permitted according to R. Simeon.. Assi²⁶³His alter ego, Ammi, is quoted in the Babli as the first authority who allows it. said, it is forbidden. Benjamin from Ginzak²⁶⁴Ginzak (“city of the treasury”) is the capital of Media, called Gazaka by Ptolemy. Another version is told in the Babli, Niddah 65a. According to the version which allows first sex acts on the Sabbath, Benjamin, called there “from Saqasan”, tried to follow a ruling attributed to Rav to the effect that a second sex act would be permitted even without waiting the seven days of a cleansing period regularly required of a menstruating women, and applied to the newlyweds since blood from the breaking of the hymen is indistinguishable from menstrual blood, as discussed in the following section. In the Babylonian version, Benjamin tried to act according to this ruling but he died before he could do so. went out and said in the name of Rab, it is allowed. Samuel heard it and resented it, he [Benjamin] died, he [Samuel] recited for him: praised be He Who smote him²⁶⁵“קרי” means “recited a Biblical verse”. There is no such verse but its intent is close to 1Sam. 25:39.. About Rav, he [Samuel] recited: (Prov. 12:21) “The just will cause no wrong.”

Or if thou wilt, I can say that both refer to the wicked upon whom fortune smiles, and still there is no contradiction; for R. Johanan may be understood as speaking of a perfectly righteous man [contending with the wicked], and the other of one who is not perfectly righteous. For Rab Huna said : What means that which is written, "Wherefore lookest Thou, when they deal treacherously, and holdest Thy peace, when the wicked swalloweth up the man that is more righteous than he"? (Hab. i. 13). Does, then, the wicked swallow up the righteous? And lo, it is written, "The Lord will not leave him in his hand" (Ps. xxxvii. 33) and "There shall no mischief befall the righteous" (Prov. xii. 21)! Nay; "the wicked swalloweth up the man that is more righteous than he," but a perfectly righteous man he doth not swallow up.